In 2017, many newspaper articles with grammar mistakes slipped through editorial review, sparking debate among readers and highlighting the importance of careful proofreading. This article examines the most common grammatical slip‑ups, their impact on credibility, and practical steps newsrooms can take to avoid similar errors in the future.
Most guides skip this. Don't It's one of those things that adds up..
Introduction
Journalistic integrity depends on clear, error‑free writing. When a high‑profile newspaper publishes a story containing a blatant grammar mistake, the damage can be immediate and far‑reaching. In real terms, the year 2017 was no exception; a series of widely reported articles revealed that even established publications were not immune to basic linguistic blunders. Understanding why these mistakes happen and how they affect public trust is essential for both readers and media professionals Easy to understand, harder to ignore..
Common Grammar Errors Found in 2017
Subject‑Verb Agreement
- Example: “The team of reporters was awarded the prize.”
- Why it matters: Incorrect agreement signals a lack of attention to detail and can confuse readers about who performed the action.
Misuse of Its vs. It’s
- Example: “The newspaper’s its editorial board announced…”
- Why it matters: This classic confusion undermines professionalism and can change the meaning of a sentence entirely.
Fragmented Sentences
- Example: “After the scandal unfolded. The public demanded answers.”
- Why it matters: Fragments disrupt the flow of information and may be interpreted as incomplete reporting.
Run‑on Sentences
- bezpečnost: “The investigation revealed new evidence, the suspect confessed, and the case was closed.”
- Why it matters: Long, unpunctuated sentences are hard to follow and can obscure key facts.
Incorrect Punctuation in Lists
- Example: “The conference featured speakers on politics, economics, and sociology.”
- Why it matters: Proper Oxford comma usage prevents ambiguity, especially in complex journalistic contexts.
Notable Cases from 2017
The Guardian “Brexit” Headline
In March 2017, The Guardian published a headline that read, “Brexit was a mistake – says the people.” The repeated use of asterisks and missing commas drew criticism for being both stylistically odd and grammatically inconsistent. Editors later clarified that the formatting was intended for emphasis, but the error highlighted the tension between creative headline writing and grammatical correctness.
The New York Times “Women’s March” Article
A story covering the Women’s March in January 2017 contained a subject‑verb agreement error: “The crowd were largely peaceful.” The mistake was spotted within hours, prompting an immediate correction and an internal review of the publication’s proofreading workflow.
BBC News “Trump’s Tweet” Recap
The BBC’s recap of a presidential tweet incorrectly wrote, “It’s the first time a president has used Twitter to attack a private citizen.” The misuse of it’s instead of its sparked a brief social media backlash, illustrating how even small errors can generate disproportionate attention.
Impact on Credibility
Reader Trust
When readers encounter a grammar mistake, they often question the overall reliability of the source. Studies show that perceived professionalism directly correlates with audience retention; a single glaring error can cause readers to doubt the accuracy of the entire article.
SEO Consequences
Search engines reward well‑structured, error‑free content. Articles containing frequent grammatical issues may rank lower because they fail to meet quality signals used by algorithms. In 2017, several news sites saw a dip in organic traffic after a spate of publicized errors Easy to understand, harder to ignore..
Legal and Ethical Repercussions
In some cases, grammatical blunders have led to misinterpretation of legal or policy statements. A poorly punctuated sentence can change the intended meaning, potentially leading to public confusion or even legal challenges.
Steps to Improve Grammar in Newsrooms
1. Implement a Multi‑Layered Editing Process
- First pass: Automated spell‑check and grammar‑check tools.
- Second pass: Junior editors perform a line‑by‑line review.
- Third pass: Senior copy editors focus on style, tone, and complex sentences.
2. Use Style Guides Consistently
Adopt a recognized style guide (e.g., The Chicago Manual of Style or AP Stylebook) and ensure all staff members receive regular training. Consistency reduces variability and helps maintain a professional voice across the organization.
3. take advantage of Technology Wisely
- Grammar‑checking software: Tools like Grammarly or ProWritingAid can flag common errors before human review.
- Readability scores: Use metrics such as Flesch‑Kincaid to ensure articles are accessible to a broad audience.
4. Encourage a Culture of Feedback
Create a safe environment where junior staff can point out potential errors without fear of reprimand. Peer review sessions can catch mistakes that automated tools miss Nothing fancy..
5. Conduct Post‑Publication Audits
After major stories, perform a quick audit of the published piece for any lingering issues. Prompt corrections not only rectify the error but also demonstrate accountability But it adds up..
Scientific Explanation of Why Grammar Matters
From a cognitive perspective, grammatical correctness aids comprehension by providing a predictable structure. Now, when sentences follow standard rules, the brain can process information faster, allowing readers to focus on content ratheralass. Conversely, grammatical errors increase cognitive load, forcing readers to pause and decipher the intended meaning. This extra effort can lead to fatigue, reduced retention, and a negative perception of the source.
Neuro‑linguistic research also shows that formal language triggers a sense of authority and credibility. When a newspaper’s writing deviates from normative grammar, readers may subconsciously assign lower expertise to the publication, even if the factual content is accurate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How often do major newspapers publish grammar errors?
A: While most reputable outlets have dependable editing processes, errors still occur. In 2017, industry reports indicated that 1–2% of published articles contained at least one grammatical mistake Simple, but easy to overlook..
Q: Can a single grammar mistake affect a newspaper’s SEO?
A: Yes. Search engines prioritize well‑written, user‑friendly content. Repeated errors can lower rankings and reduce click‑through rates.
Q: What should readers do if they spot a mistake?
A: Readers can contact the newspaper’s corrections desk or use social media to flag the issue. Most reputable news organizations respond promptly and publish corrections transparently Not complicated — just consistent..
Q: Are automated tools enough to catch all errors?
A: No. While tools are valuable for flagging common issues, they often miss contextual nuances, homophone errors, and complex sentence structures. Human review remains essential.
Conclusion
The prevalence of newspaper articles with grammar mistakes in 2017 served as a reminder that even the most seasoned publications are vulnerable to linguistic slip‑ups. These errors, ranging from simple subject‑verb disagreements to more complex punctuation issues, can erode reader trust, harm SEO performance, and
and ultimately affect the newspaper’s reputation. While automated checkers and style guides are invaluable, they cannot replace the human eye that understands context, nuance, and the subtle expectations of a readership. By fostering a culture where junior staff feel safe to raise concerns, integrating rigorous peer‑review practices, and instituting swift post‑publication audits, newsrooms can dramatically reduce the incidence of preventable errors That's the whole idea..
In the digital age, where a single misspelling can spread instantly across platforms, the cost of grammatical lapses extends far beyond a momentary embarrassment. Now, readers who encounter consistent errors are more likely to question the credibility of the information presented, leading to decreased loyalty and lower engagement metrics. Worth adding, search engines reward clear, well‑structured content, making grammar a silent yet powerful factor in a publication’s visibility and reach And that's really what it comes down to. Took long enough..
The takeaway is clear: grammar is not a mere stylistic concern—it is a cornerstone of journalistic integrity. Investing in thorough editing processes, encouraging open dialogue about potential mistakes, and maintaining transparency when errors do slip through are essential practices for any outlet that aspires to maintain trust, authority, and relevance in an increasingly competitive media landscape. By treating grammar as a non‑negotiable standard rather than an optional polish, newspapers can safeguard their reputation and see to it that the stories they tell are delivered with the precision and professionalism their audiences deserve And it works..
