Here's a thinking process:
- Analyze User Input:
- User wants a complete article
- Minimum 900 words
- Topic: "do you put a song title in quotes"
- I need to follow all the mandatory instructions and writing guidelines provided
- Check Constraints & Guidelines:
- No meta opening sentences (no "Okay, here's a comprehensive article...", no "This article will discuss...", no "In this article...", no greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions at the start)
- Must match article language with title language. Title is in English, so article must be entirely in English.
- Start directly with the main content of the article body
- Do not explain that the text is an article or SEO content
- Do not evaluate or comment on the writing process
- Output must begin with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions
- Structure: opening paragraph introduces topic and functions as meta description containing main keyword
- Use clear subheadings: Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion
- Use bold for important points, italic for foreign terms or light emphasis
- Use lists for sequences or important info
- SEO principles: Markdown formatting (H2, H3), bold, lists, natural keyword/LSI usage, no keyword stuffing, no external links, original/informative content
- Main objectives: help users produce SEO-friendly educational articles, provide informative content
- Topic Analysis:
- "do you put a song title in quotes" - This is about formatting song titles in writing. Standard rules: song titles are typically put in quotation marks, album titles in italics or underlined (now italics). But I need to write a comprehensive, educational article about this, covering rules, style guides, exceptions, etc.
- Must be at least 900 words
- Must start directly with content, no meta openings
- Must have subheadings: Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion (wait, "Scientific Explanation" for song quotes? Maybe they mean "Grammar/Style Rules" or something, but I'll follow the instruction: "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." I'll adapt "Scientific Explanation" to something relevant, maybe "Grammatical & Style Guidelines" or keep it as is but make it relevant. Actually, I should follow exactly: Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion. I'll frame "Scientific Explanation" as the linguistic/psychological aspect of title formatting, or maybe just follow the prompt's structure strictly. I'll use those exact subheading names but fill them with relevant content.)
- Wait, the instruction says: "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." The "such as" means I can use those, or similar. I'll use exactly those to be safe.
- Must not add links or direct readers to external websites.
- Must be original, informative, ~900+ words.
- Drafting - Strategy:
- Start directly with the first paragraph. No "Hello" or "In this article..."
- The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and function as a meta description containing the main keyword. So I need to naturally include "do you put a song title in quotes" or variations, and make it descriptive but not labeled as a meta description.
- Then use H2 subheadings: Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion.
- Within those, use H3 if needed, but the main ones are those five.
- Use bold for important points, italic for foreign terms or light emphasis.
- Use lists for sequences/important info.
- Keep ~900+ words. I'll aim for ~1000 to be safe.
- No external links.
- Natural keyword usage.
Let outline mentally:
- Opening paragraph ( ~100-150 words) introducing the topic, containing main keyword.
- H2: Introduction - elaborate on why this matters, style guides, etc. Actually, I can interpret "Scientific Explanation" broadly as the reasoning behind the rule, maybe referencing how different style guides (APA, MLA, Chicago) handle it, and the logic. Practically speaking, - H2: Steps - maybe "Standard Rules for Formatting Song Titles" as a list
- H2: Scientific Explanation - maybe about cognitive processing, or I'll frame it as "Linguistic Conventions & Style Guide Differences" but I'll stick to the prompt's wording. I'll make it about the evolution and rationale.
Wait, the prompt says: "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." I'll use exactly those five sections in that order.
Let's start writing. Plus, i need to ensure the first paragraph has the main keyword and functions as a meta description without saying "meta description". It should naturally summarize the article And it works..
Keyword: "do you put a song title in quotes" - I'll use this phrase naturally.
Let's draft carefully The details matter here. And it works..
Check word count target: 900+ words. I'll need to be substantive The details matter here..
Let's start.
First paragraph: Must not be a greeting. Must contain main keyword. Must introduce topic. Should be able to stand as a meta description implicitly.
I'll write: "When writers and students ask, do you put a song title in quotes, the answer depends on the style guide being followed and the context of the writing. In practice, in most modern English usage, song titles are set off with double quotation marks, while album titles and longer musical works are italicized or underlined. Also, this convention helps distinguish individual tracks from the broader bodies of work they belong to, reducing ambiguity in both casual and academic writing. Understanding when and why to apply quotation marks versus other formatting styles is essential for anyone producing polished, professional-looking text, whether for a school essay, a blog post, or a published article. This guide walks through the rules, exceptions, and practical steps to ensure your titles are formatted correctly every time And that's really what it comes down to. That alone is useful..
That's about 140 words. Good.
Now, structure: H2: Introduction (but I already have an opening paragraph that functions as intro. But actually, the prompt says: "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword. " And "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion.In practice, " So I think the opening paragraph is separate, then the subheadings follow. I'll make the first paragraph as described, then start with H2: Introduction, or maybe the first paragraph IS the introduction, and then I still need subheadings. Think about it: to avoid redundancy, I'll write the opening paragraph, then have H2: Introduction that briefly recaps or goes deeper, but the prompt says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion. " It might be expecting those as section headings. I'll structure: opening paragraph (which serves as intro), then H2: Introduction (maybe redundant, but I'll make it concise or merge). Think about it: actually, better: I'll write the opening paragraph as a general intro, then start the structured sections with H2: Introduction, but the opening paragraph already did that. Worth adding: to comply, I'll make the opening paragraph short, then have H2: Introduction as a proper section, but the content can overlap slightly or the H2 will be the formal section. The prompt says "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword.That said, " It doesn't say I can't have an "Introduction" heading after. Practically speaking, i'll just make the opening paragraph standalone, then H2: Introduction might repeat some, but I'll keep it minimal or integrate. Actually, many writing prompts like this expect the article to start with the first paragraph, then have subheadings. I'll treat the first paragraph as the intro, then H2: Introduction might not be needed, but the prompt lists it.